The Impact of Removing the Class 10 Cut-Off Point

The Impact of Removing the Class 10 Cut-Off Point

Students in Class 10 progressing without a cut-off point can expand access to education but also raise concerns about quality and preparedness. Global research shows both positive and negative impacts of such policies.

The decision to waive the cut-off point for Class 10 students—allowing all who pass to progress into higher secondary education—has been debated globally. Countries such as Bhutan have experimented with this policy to promote equitable access to education. While the move aligns with international goals of inclusivity and universal secondary education, research highlights both positive impacts (greater access, reduced stress, equity) and negative consequences (quality dilution, resource strain, employability challenges) The Bhutanese voiceofresearch.org Asia News Network.

---

Positive Impacts

1. Equitable Access to Education
   Removing the cut-off point ensures that students from disadvantaged backgrounds are not excluded due to rigid academic thresholds. This aligns with UNESCO’s vision of “Education for All,” promoting inclusivity and reducing systemic inequality voiceofresearch.org.
2. Reduced Psychological Pressure
   Studies show that high-stakes cut-off exams often cause stress, anxiety, and dropout rates among adolescents. Waiving them can foster a healthier learning environment, encouraging students to continue education without fear of exclusion The Bhutanese.
3. Higher Transition Rates to Secondary Education
   In Bhutan, after the policy change in 2019, more students successfully transitioned to Class 11, reflecting improved retention and progression rates voiceofresearch.org. Globally, similar reforms have been linked to higher enrollment in upper secondary schools.
4. Alignment with Global Development Goals
   Expanding access supports the UN Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education), ensuring that every child has the opportunity to complete secondary education regardless of performance at a single stage.

---

Negative Impacts

1. Declining Academic Standards
   Critics argue that removing cut-off points may lower the overall quality of education. Without academic filtering, schools face challenges in maintaining rigorous standards, potentially leading to weaker graduates Asia News Network.
2. Resource Strain on Schools
   Increased enrollment without proportional investment in infrastructure, teachers, and materials can overwhelm the system. Larger class sizes and limited resources may reduce the effectiveness of teaching and learning voiceofresearch.org.
3. Employability Concerns
   Global research indicates that students progressing without adequate academic preparation may struggle in higher education or the job market. Employers often question the competency of graduates when standards are perceived to be diluted Asia News Network.
4. Policy Instability
   Frequent shifts between having and removing cut-off points, as seen in Bhutan, create uncertainty for students, teachers, and parents. This instability undermines trust in the education system and complicates long-term planning Asia News Network.

---

The removal of the Class 10 cut-off point reflects a trade-off between equity and quality. On one hand, it democratizes access, reduces stress, and supports global education goals. On the other, it risks lowering standards, straining resources, and affecting employability. Global research suggests that the success of such policies depends on complementary reforms—including investment in teacher training, curriculum redesign, and targeted support for struggling learners. Ultimately, the challenge lies in balancing inclusivity with excellence to ensure that expanded access translates into meaningful educational outcomes.

---

Sources: The BhutaneseThe Bhutanese – Class 10 cut-off debate voiceofresearch.orgVoice of Research – Bhutan’s case of waiving cut-off point Asia News NetworkAsia News Network – Critics on reinstating cut-off point

---